| Since your a young go getter and are here to prove a point. I'll put an end to this by addressing your points. Then please go keep reading. Everyone has more to learn, what is your point in this section? I said two smaller turbos (on a V config motor) will produce a more responsive car over one large turbo (on an inline config motor), what does any of the above have to do with that? I don't expect you to add every detail to your post if you leave out certain information to make the point more valid. Like you do with my responses. Got search how many post I have on here and talk about " DRAG ". But then again, you've read every post on here ( who are you kidding ), so no need to look, right? Anyway, back to the point. Response here was on larger turbo's. Not OEM turbo's. Yes, two little T25 Z turbo's are going to Spool faster over a 74,76,80mm single turbo. Not to difficult of an expectation. Even still I asked you Mr speed reader do you know why a Supra runs a sequential turbo set up on it's inline motor? I must have over looked your answer or are you still looking for it through all your reading? Let me guess, your now going to come back and claim you've read every post on Supraforums. I said you get better top END (not in), and yes - its true. This is why you see many Supra's able to put down 1000+hp. BIG turbos with lots of lag = great top end (not great response).
This was all in response to your (questionable at best) claim that an inline motor is inherently more responsive that a V motor.
As far as your salt flats comment, there are two very important variables in a high speed run, power and DRAG. Z32 can excel in both where as the "dominant" supra can only exceed (relative to the Z32) in one. You fail to take into consider DRAG in your argument. LOL, oh boy. I can't believe I'm going to address this question. Look power is power and design is design. Without getting to technical here the inline is balanced thus can rev higher. If you can rev 30% more, say 10000rpm vs 7000rpm, that's 30% more hp because it's proportional to the flow and yeah and a big single is more efficient than 2 medium sized turbo's. Accounting and inline uses all 3.0 liters of displacement to support the turbo, wise 1.5 liters for the smaller twins.
Here is where your lack of intelligence and memory shines through. I've been on this forum for over 2.5 years. And over the course of the last two years I have made it a point to read every post (I may miss a few late replies but I have at least skimmed every post). For the first year or some I read FAR more that I posted (lurked). So with that said, no I am not new here. Getting a message on AIM by the poster doesn't make you elite. It may, however, hint that you might not be making an attempt to read every post on the forum and had you not been notified of the post you would have probably missed it.
Having been on the forum for a long time won't do you alot of good:
A: unless you make a point to try to keep up and read most of the posts.
-or-
B: if you are an idiot.
I'll pick B for you, how's that sound? 2.5 years, wow Congrats Man!!!!!! The point about the AIM message means Mr. Speed reader. That many LONG time forum members chat OFFLINE of this forum, because punk ass NEW people that come in here and act like or better yet think they can invent the wheel and ruin a lot of good posts. Many of us chat away where it can remain civil and do still at times bring it to the Forum. It's not that I'm going to miss anything, trust me. You try being here for 6+ years and tell me then that you haven't seen just about all there is to know about the cars. All that's left is people's cars to look at, new run times and some new idea's of small mods, for sale ad's, events, etc. I don't think I need to read question's like comparing two totally different cars in both manufacture and motor design then ask about comparing turbo spool from a one exhaust pipe type to a dual exhaust pipe car. Yet, I did and gave you a good times taking reply only to get a typical youth response. Be glad you join'd that forum now and not back in the day. You would have been eaten alive for asking such a dumb question like that. The tire statement I made was in response to you saying Joel would need a wide body (to facilitate wider tires) to put down that power. This is false. Look at the fastest people on this forum like Zhound and Greg, do they have widebody Z's...no. Because, they know what they are doing when it comes to setting up their cars to run a 1/4 mile (including tire selection).
Tire selection - something you seem to know nothing about. You assume because you can fit wider tires on a supra that Z owners should be required to use the same width of tire if putting out high HP. You run 315mm wide tires on a stock 9.5" wide wheel.
Wow, you are an idiot - I bet your car handles great.
Here's a clue: get tires to fit your wheels. Finally, you talk about reading and doing it(the sentence doesn’t make much sense). What do you mean step up? Is that a challenge or something, WTF? You are older than me, wow! Unfortunately you were most likely just as dumb when you were 25 as you are now.. LOL, I'm sorry, it's just weird responding to your statements when I think " how long you've been here and the way you talk towards me ". Look, I'm just another member on here. Just so happens to have been here awhile. No biggie. Ok, on to the tire response. You say false with your 2.5 years here and read every post ( lol, had to throw that in ). Ok, think about it for a second, your stating ZO's car and Greg's 240 ( I take it ) maybe his Z32 that was originally another former member's car on here that up a left. Know who that was? Damn, you've read every post, course you did. Anyway how much power is either car putting down? Well, by reading every post on here you'd know this answer too. Now, take their power and compare it to where Joel is going, say 1000rwhp. Ok, knowing most Supra's running this kinda power ( which for an auto is 850rwhp ) they'll run a 325 slick, some a 315 slick. They still can spin, but for the most part, it hooks. Ok, show me one post where someone has put a set of 315's on a Regular framed Z32. Just one. Since you've read every post, this should be an easy one for you. Next, you read the part about my 315's on my car I see. Now be a man and post the rest of my statement there bright one. You know the part that say's they came with the car when I bought it? So why pull them off when their already set and matched. I even posted pictures on the other site to show that it doesn't look bad at all regardless if myself and you bright one know that there ideally not matched with a rim of that width. They will be replaced and soon. Look for a thread to see why here in the next day or so. As far as handling. I would be willing to bet $1000 that I could take your car on a track as the cars sit right now. If you think you know so much, then this should be yet another easy answer from you. This car is built for it and it can take corners at near twice the posted speed. The cars is lowered to the point that the front 275 tires are up under the fenders. As I'm sure you've seen in pictures because you've read every post. You know it has Tein Coilovers on all fours. I'm not saying your car is bad by no means here. Just answering your well knowledge reply. Plus I love the Z more than any other car and the fact that mine has a lot more done to it than yours, tells me that you'll get whooped and bad. Sorry to come off so harsh, I just don't like it when people post questionable or straight wrong information as fact... I couldn't agree more. Sometimes you can see where someone has been there done that. More so when they use THEIR own car as a reference. Good luck in your search for better ways in what ever your doing. Oh and no, I never meant to challenge you in any way. That's just plan silly. As my daughter in high school would say, lol. sorry for any typo's, it's late.
1991 300zx TT Stg VIII+  1994 Supra T 67k miles SP77HO Full turbo kit  2002 Mustang Convertible GT 2002 Expedition XLT 4x4 Triton V8
|
